That does not necessarily mean It really is Completely wrong. Introducing your self as "myself X" just isn't grammatically Incorrect, but it sounds seriously odd. When you are speaking a language, there are a list of procedures you must adhere to. And at times we let our community language impact it, which is ok. But it will seem seriously odd to the one who, say, is a native speaker.
Is there a concept of Turing Machine about a group, not simply more than the integers like a product of the tape?
The expression you utilize, "Here's the link for tomorrow's session." appears high-quality as it is, but you could relate your email for your earlier discussion of your Assembly: "Here is the hyperlink to the Conference to become held at ten:30 AM tomorrow, that we talked over yesterday:
This phrase is Employed in a context in which [another person or something] solves a problem within an exaggeratedly fast and brutal way.
If you need to be certain about the place or time the party happened, you use The easy previous:
You could potentially say "Here's my cellular range:" as a substitute. As for tone, which is significantly less linked to English plus more associated with the character of the connection. Usually, You do not generate your boss using the exact tone as creating your best Pal.
four @snailboat: Agreed. There is certainly a growing inclination to implement "re" as a direct substitution for "with regards to, about, on the subject of", but beyond "automobile-created electronic mail header" contexts (or manual replication oline Shopping Deals of same) It is really likely somewhat also everyday For most contexts.
is just a prefix applied right before the subject line of the preceding e-mail information to signify The brand new message is often a reply for the preceding message.
I am not mindful of this being any kind of stock phrase or idiom. Perhaps It is really a typical phrase in some group or sub-lifestyle, but not in widespread English usage.
mairemaire 2122 bronze badges Incorporate a comment
This meme was then taken up Considerably later to designate the noise of a cash printer, as if we could then remedy a fiscal trouble by printing a lot of money in a short time. (We then from time to time discover the disappearance of the "t" inside the meme, so we get "[X] goes brrr".)
What’s the big distinction between these two? The context is always that I noticed a little something, let say a minute ago. I don’t know if The mix of “just” and “observed” will work, for the reason that “just” ensures that the point I saw was witnessed a moment in the past and “saw” implies that the motion is completely concluded. If, In this particular context, “just saw” is good, then wherein context can we use “just see”?
StoneyB on hiatusStoneyB on hiatus 176k1414 gold badges263263 silver badges465465 bronze badges Incorporate a remark
Stack Exchange network is made up of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most dependable online Local community for developers to know, share their knowledge, and Develop their careers. Check out Stack Exchange